Generalfox.com

Advanced Science Topics and Thought

Generalfox.com

Speed of Creation

As stated, these vaccines are experimental, so therefore they have not undergone the years of testing as prior performed with traditional vaccines. Regulators in the USA and United Kingdom confirmed only 11 months after the discovery of COVID-19 that an mRNA vaccine for COVID-19 was already ready – a task that prior took no less than 4 years.

It should not be surprising then that these mRNA vaccines released by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) only. Note that under an EUA, the FDA “…may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives…”.

Of course everyone will have their own opinion as to what is “Safe”. For me, I was dismayed when I read that when a company requests permission to release a ‘solution’ to an EUA, the FDA only requires “…a phase 3 safety database of well over 3,000 vaccine recipients, representing a high proportion of participants enrolled in the phase 3 study, who have been followed for serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest for at least one month after completion of the full vaccination regimen.”. To me, considering that the product stands to be applied to a possible 332,000,000 people (that’s just the number of people living in the USA), a test bed of only 3,000 people seems extremely inadequate. As I calculate it, they are burdening the risk on the result of a study effectively performed on 0.001% of the total population across the entire population. I’m surprised that they would not want the test group count to be significantly higher, covering a wide-range of cultures and age groups, and for a much longer period of time so as to expose more adverse affects. And I am not alone in this thought – according to the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Pfizer BioNTech’s study included 2,260 children and adolescents, 12-15 years of age, 1,131 of whom received the vaccine. This is a very small number of adolescents and does not permit an evaluation of rare but serious side-effects, such as effects that may happen in only 1:5,000 adolescents. Furthermore, with most of the adolescents followed for only 1 or 2 months after their 2nd dose, there is no data to support long-term safety.”. (Article here).

Question: In the case of COVID-19, I wonder why since there was such a rushed focus on just these mRNA solutions, and why (referencing COVID-19 symptoms), other existing methods of treatment were not examined in great detail? As an example, one doctor helped patients using an older technique that helps to drain the lungs of excessive fluid build-up – without the use of respirators.

Release / Trials

Vaccine trials take place in stages, starting with trials on animals, followed by three trials on people. Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial included over 40,000 people and began in July 2020. Moderna’s Phase 3 trial included over 30,000 people and also began July 2020. It is stated that most safety issues that would affect significant numbers of vaccines generally appear within the first two months after vaccination. However, with a vaccine having been given to millions of people, very rare side effects that cannot be anticipated from clinical trials could develop – so these manufacturers stated that researchers and regulators will be keeping a close eye on how the vaccine rollout goes.

Problems with the Trials / Tests?

As I have come to understand, there seemed to be some issues regarding the Phizer vaccine trials. Here is a link to a video from the Candian COVID Care Alliance that seemed to have a fair bit of information in it regarding some of the faults in the trials. I have not validated all of the information in it.

Regional Director blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial. Here is an interview with Brook Jackson, prior Regional Director for Ventaiva Research Group, who had repeatedly advised the company of some problems, eventually emailing a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). She was fired later that same day. According to The BMJ that the company she worked for had falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. As well, staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. She has also provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. In the latest for this, the lawsuit is moving forward without assitance from the US Government.

Raising Awareness – Obtaining Buy-in

Governments have coerced individuals in getting vaccinated by offering them free donuts, hamburgers, beer, lottery money, marijuana, or restricting people’s core and basic freedoms. Free ice-cream and money was offered to children aged 12 and older. Some children, desparate from being isolated for so long, took the vaccine shots in the hope their lives would return to “normal” again. I understood some schools to have psychologically manipulated students into wanting to become vaccinated via school plays. The CDC has created a resource web-page that teachers can use to promote and teach “Vaccine Confidence” in their classroom.

Observations:

  • The CDC is obviously biased towards everyone becoming vaccinated.
  • Teachers are viewed as authority figures and are presented as individuals to be respected, admired, knowledgeable, presenting undisputable facts, and always guiding you in the ‘right direction’. But teachers must never be viewed as always being 100% correct, as I have in many occasions in highschool and college, corrected teachers admitting to be teaching outdated curriculums considering that day’s most current scientific knowledge. For our children to be ‘free thinkers’, teachers should always present un-biased facts and information.
  • I believe children must never learn to just do as they are told, or take any information as being un-disputed fact – they must always be taught to consider as many angles as possible, obtain a full understand of all of the information, and then make a decision and be able to debate it, thoroughly. If their points survivie a debate, then the information holds credence and is more likely correct than not.
  • My worry is that with teachers only referencing the CDC information and resources, are presenting biased information, viewed by children as undesputable information, which to me is gravely concerning – especially considering that this is all just a medical experiment. I wonder as to how many children have been, are continuing to be, steered towards becoming vaccinated through this indoctrination methodology.

Lead by example?

Of course, it didn’t help that as government officials essentially shut down our economy and negatively impacted our mental health by imposing lock-downs, that they were not adhereing to those same restrictions that we had been placed under. Of this there are many examples in the news. Such as Obama’s party. You could do your own search for more politicians that broke their own lockdown rules, but here is the one I used.

Mandated Vaccinations

There was talk and action towards making these experimental mRNA vaccines mandatory, but this was reversed. It is my understanding that it is against the Nuremburg code to force an individual to partake in an experiment, thus I grew concerned that this would be in violation, and wondered what the result would be.

  • Question: It is not possible to legally force someone to take these mRNA vaccines. It has been made very clear that these mRNA vaccines are experimental – therefore we are protected from forced vaccination under the terms of the Nuremberg Code, forbidding experimentation on human subjects without their informed consent. Is this why there are so many restrictions being put in place – to try to force people (using indirect force) to becoming vaccinated?

Read the next section, “VAERS Datasource“.