Table of Contents
Were Products Manufactured Years Prior To COVID-19 Virus?
This is an interesting one. I found it incredibly interesting to read that there was a database which had available inventoried products listed which referenced COVID-19, long before the virus was announced, discovered, or of any interest. Of course, this made many people wondered how it was possible for products to be listed and already named for a virus that was only recently discovered… Here are some web archives, showing products listed as far back as 2017 for COVID-19 (here, here, here, here, here, and here). As this drew interest, the World Bank provided a response, advising that it was merely how the items were identified, and that they became under the umbrella of COVID-19 products and thus listed. I’m unsure as to how this is possible, considering the information was gleaned from the website prior to their ‘adjustment’ – perhaps I am not understanding something…?
Coronavirus patents
Yes, coronavirus patents most certainly do exist, and have for years. And yes, one is, in fact, owned by The Pirbright Institute which received funding from Bill Gates through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Another, is owned by the Center for Disease and Control (CDC). These are probably owned to protect their related intellectual properties and results of any research that might prove financially viable. Does this mean companies and individuals are making money off this research due to the fact that COVID-19 is ‘out in the wild’? Certainly! Medicine became a ‘for profit’ concept decades ago. Ever checked out Cancer research, and the profits made from? It could be possible that money is to be made off the activation (usage) of the patents.
But what does this prove? Well, nothing that I could find or think of. Here is an article discussing some common misconceptions about the connection between Coronavirus patents and the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Did they stage the release of COVID-19?
The background behind this starts with a statement made (full video) January 2017 by Anthony Fauci to a crowd at the Georgetown University Medical Center that “there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease… but also there will be a surprise outbreak…” (quoted at 3:19 in). I think what people find interesting is that for three years prior, Gain of Function research had been banned, until just 11 days prior to Donald Trump taking the office of the US Presidency, when the US NIAD released a statement stating why Gain of Function research should be permitted, and then started to write exemptions which were all approved by Anthony Fauci. Interview here between US Senator Rand Paul and Laura Ingrahm. Here is a news article.
Was there a cover-up? Did they delete scientific data?
It never looks good when data is deleted – but it also does not imply any wrong-doing. A researcher noticed that information had been deleted from an online scientific database in 2020. While working to build the family tree of COVID-19 he noticed that the information was missing. He was able to recover 13 early coronavirus sequences by reviewing files stored on Google Cloud. This information is important because the genetic sequences of viral samples hold crucial clues about how SARS-CoV-2 shifted to our species from another animal. Most precious of all are sequences from early in the pandemic, because they take scientists closer to the original spillover event. While the researcher was able to recover 13 sequences from the cloud this way, there is still a lot of data missing. “I hope we hear from the authors who generated, but then deleted, these crucial sequences so we can understand more about their motivation for doing so.” a researcher said. “It certainly is strange at face value and really demands an explanation.”. While this is interesting and curious, I’m not sure it could be concluded that this is a cover-up at this time.
Did Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum model this COVID-19 Outbreak? (Event 201)
I’m not partial to this as being accurate. Here is a Business Insider news article about the event. Here is a link to Event 201 held October 2019 – six weeks before the first reported COVID-19 illness. Here is a media statement from Johns Hopskins. And here is a Fact Check performed by USA Today (seems legit) that agrees while co-incidental, there does not seem to be a direct tie between the simulation and the COVID-19 outbreak. So, has Bill Gates financed the modelling of a pandemic outbreak? Yes! But then so have others, including the US Military. As an example, the US Military performed live tests to determine how far air-borne pathogens penetrate into cities, and their effectiveness. I’d suggest this as being worse than that of a simulation. But isn’t the military there to protect citizens? And isn’t the government directed to the same? It would seem not. What I do know for certain is that when a military performs experiments on the public, this erodes public trust in both the military and the government. And just to be clear, there have been many experiments performed by governments on their public – without their knowledge or consent.
Were sitting presidents offered bribes?
I’d suggest not. It has been suggested that the President of Belarus was offered a USD $940 million bribe in the form of “Covid Relief Aid”, requiring him to: impose an “extreme lock-down on his people”, force them to wear face masks, impose very strict curfews, impose a police state, and crash the economy. In reviewing this transcript of an IMF press briefing, I do not believe that they reached out to every government and bribed them all. I could understand them seeking assurances that the countries would take steps necessary to contain the pandemic in line with WHO recommendations. Self described on their website as:
I choose to believe that they were not acting to drive countries in a negative way. I’m unclear as to any benefit for them to do so.
Has there been a lot of athletes dying from COVID-19 vaccinations?
While social media has a lot of posts purporting up to 108 athletes having perished, I have not been able to verify this information as valid. In fact, while you have to be careful of fact-checkers findings, these three websites point to that this is misinformation.
Statements purported to have been spoken by Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier
- Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier has confirmed that there is no chance of survival for people who have received any form of the vaccine.
- There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have been vaccinated already. We must be prepared to incinerate the bodies.
- They will all die from antibody dependent enhancement.
While reading some Fact Check articles I understood and agreed that the above quotations were not true. That said, the Nobel prize winner did speak to his opposition to mandatory vaccinations in France and drew criticism from fellow academics for broadcasting what they considered to be “dangerous messages”. And in an interview posted online Montagnier claimed that the vaccines have produced new coronavirus variants and that “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths“, thanks to “antibody dependent enhancement,” (ADE) which he says can create more severe disease.
COVID-19 Shedding
It has been suggested that you can get COVID-19 from someone who has been vaccinated through a process called Shedding. But I have not found any research indicating this to be true as none of the vaccines have the COVID-19 virus in it (active or deactivated).
However, Luigi Warren tweeted regarding that the mRNA solutions could cause those vaccinated to shed the spike protein that is created. After Twitter deleted the tweet he responded that he is essentially “the inventor of the technology on which Moderna was founded”, thus implying that he might just know what he’s talking about. Luigi purported that the shedding would be minuscule and would not affect others. So whether true or not it would seem that this is essentially a moot point.
PCR Test Recall
Certainly there has been at least one PCR Test recall, after all it is a mass manufactured product and thus can have defects from time to time, but there was never a full PCR Test recall as has been suggested in social media.
US Government Stimulus Checks
The US Government decided to help people fight COVID-19 by providing families with a financial stimulus to stay at home. The stimulus total was USD $2 Trillion dollars (and has since ballooned to USD $6 Trillion). While it was said that there was enough money in the $2 Trillion stimulus to finance every American family $20,000 to stay at home (slowing the COVID-19 outbreak), it seems that instead significant monies went to special interest, campaign donors, and the Kennedy Space center. Articles here, here, and here. So most people instead only received around USD $3,200. As there are around 143,000,000 people in the US, this calculates to USD $457,600,000,000 being distributed, leaving a whopping USD $1.5 Trillion going to other benefactors – or if you reference the latest amount ($6 Trillion) then $5.5 Trillion went to others. Every US citizen should always remember that they are technically “on the hook” for their countries deficit – therefore, they were given around $3,200 but now owe around $42,000 for having received that amount – which will have to be collected via taxes – because those companies do not have to repay! Wondering which companies were awarded monies from this stimulus? Well, you can find out here, “COVID Stimulus Watch“, but you will not be advised as to why some of these exceptionally huge companies were awarded funding while small and mid-sized companies were allowed to fail. The website identifies:
“The 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (or CARES Act) provides hundreds of billions of dollars in assistance to large and small corporations whose operations have been disrupted by the Covid-19 pandemic. The public deserves to know which companies are receiving the assistance and whether aid is flowing to firms with a poor record of corporate accountability.”
Of course, this retracts confidence in the Government’s commitment statements to improving the situation and providing an ability for people to simply stay home long enough for the virus to die off naturally, as it seems instead it was used to provide huge sums of money to large companies having (per my understanding) huge profits and pays for corporate elites.