Generalfox.com

Advanced Science Topics and Thought

Generalfox.com

Introduction

Curious about the possibilities but thinking (or believing) it impossible? Let me ask you two questions that most everyone will generally answer “No” to and be amazed when you advise them that it is really possible:

  1. Is it possible for someone to see the image that I am thinking about in my mind using electronic devices?
  2. Is it possible for someone to listen into my deepest thoughts – listen to my ‘inner voice’ using electronic devices?
  3. Placing a magnet of specific strength and properties by an area of your head (external to the body), could I change your moral judgement?

Intrigued? Perhaps frightened as most people are? Keep reading.

Note that I have many knowledgebase articles with each having different types of information that support this narrative. If you read something that you are unfamiliar with, or that you wish further evidence for, feel free to read the appropriate knowledgebase article.

As stated on my landing page I attended DeVry Institute of Technology in Toronto, Ontario, Canada for my education in Electronics. While working in the Electronics Lab I became very interested in how the electrical signals generated by the body could be read by electronic devices. It was a simple thing that started all this for me – I used a hand-held temperature scanner to read an individuals body temperature. The gun read the infrared radiation generated by his body and converted it into an estimate of the person’s temperature. Up to then I hadn’t really thought about that the body: generates energy, uses it internally to function, can absorbe externally applied energy; and therefore that energy could be read by devices. While this remained a passing interest for me for years, my interest was again peaked when I visited the high-risk prenatal section in a hospital and felt sad seeing all the babies hooked up to equipment while laying isolated in their glass cribs. I thought it would be awesome if they could be monitored without having anything touching them. So I started looking for a solution. During my solutioning I learned about the USA Diplomats that had been attacked by EMF Weapons in Cuba and China – which even further amplified my interest as this made sense as a new weapons technology base. I mean after all, once contructed, wouldn’t a weapon able to directly affect your innermost self covertly be the most ultimate weapon to ever exist? Certainly! And now let’s all pretend that nobody else (bad) has thought of this.

You might be surprised to read that the ability to remotely read biological signals is actually a rather hot topic! In fact, prizes have been offered to those researchers making the most advances in this type of research. Recently a company called “Final Frontier Medical Devices” won US$2.6 million for their research from the Qualcomm Tricorder X-Prize! And yes, that is the same “Tricorder” technology referenced in Star Trek.

Reading Weak Biological Signals: The speed at which ethical biological research is currently conducted is exceedingly slow as it has generally has a requirement of a patient having surgery. This limits the number and type of studies that can be performed, is time consuming and constrained, is prone to health risks, and restricts mobility. This type of research is called “Invasive” as devices must be touching, or in, the body. Therefore, finding a remote way (a non-invasive way) to read biological signals would exponentially expedite research. Quick research revealed to me that there has not been any significant research in non-invasive monitoring – in fact I am often advised that it is not generally possible or with suggestions of ‘quackery’.

Interfacing With The Body: Having the ability to interface with a person’s body using technology is also becoming a necessity. As an example it has been discovered that a person in a coma may actually be listening in to conversations around them and be fully cognizant of their surroundings – they are simply unable to ‘connect’ with the world (speak, movements, etc.). Scientists have been able to ‘speak’ with people while in a dream state – wouldn’t it be fantastic if we could communicate with people who are in a coma state?

What is a good way to start this investigation? Most people are biased to that this is impossible before any conversation begins as for decades we’ve generally understood that it is basically impossible to read ultra-weak biological signals without invasive techniques (let alone ‘write’ them back to the body) AND that electrical signals cannot easily penetrate the body AND that it takes significant amounts of power to affect a person. Of course, none of this is true, so I now introduce this topic by first discussing how this is accomplished by every-day creatures in our natural environment!

How Does Nature Read Extremely Faint Signals?

Evolution works to the benefit of the creature – making it more resilient in its surroundings or able to detect predator or prey – working to make it stronger in an attempt to keep the species alive. For thousands of years both animals and insects have evolved on the Earth and thus are subject to its environment, including its electromagnetic features.  Materials within the body and present on the Earth can be affected by the Earth’s magnetic field and electrical energy. Through the principles of evolution, it would be logical for bodies to take any advantage of any possible feature present in or on the Earth, including its Magnetic and Electrical potentials. I list some of these below:

Of course, all of the above conflicts with what I learned in school – years ago I was taught that the presence of a large ‘signal’ makes it virtually impossible to detect smaller signals. I was also taught that environmental ‘noise’ (other signals or energy present) is so great that it would not be possible to read a weak signal in nature (think of static when you exit a radio stations broadcast signal zone). But if this were true then bumblebees, flies, sharks, etc. would never have evolved into their current states. Consider just how weak those signals that these creatures are detecting are versus how strong other relative signals must be – for example bumblebees fly (how far?) to get to a flower and then return to the hive – without using Ubers – and all by using hairs to detect electrical fields generated by flowers! And, it is obvious that these concepts work irrelevant as to the medium (ie. air for Bumblebees and water for sharks). So now we start to see that the impossible is not impossible after all!

Removing The Quackery

Of course, nobody has to believe or agree with what is written here, but you should not dismiss ideas or concepts due to a lack of knowledge. As I’ve gathered information from various sources on the Internet I’ve learned that there is a tremendous amount of misinformation out there – so I’ve done my best to ensure that all information presented is credible and only references peer reviewed articles / papers published on accredited research systems such as PubMed or Research Gate, regularly reviewed news agencies, electronic magazines, declassified CIA documents, or the like.

Education And The Framework

In order to understand how it is possible for remotely positioned electronic devices to interface with the body, you have to have a firm understanding of a few concepts (or at least have an cursory understanding). For instance – how the body is viewed electrically. Yes, electrically – most people are unaware that the human body functions uses electrical energy in almost every function. Another concept – our environment (Earth) is electrically charged – think Lightning!…there is a constant electrical difference between the sky and the ground – and we remain in this even when flying in an airplane. Combining these two concepts opens the door to a new one, which is that everything can be translated into electrical circuits, which can then be combined into one large electrical circuit. Add to this that we are already able to interface with the stronger signals that are generated by the body using remotely positioned technologies, and that we have technologies that enable us to measure extremely low power signals at extreme distances, and you can start to see how possible it should be for us to remotely interface with the weak signals generated by the body.

Now that I’ve provided a basic framework, I’ll provide you with the ability to divulge into the foundations behind each of the concepts that I believe necessary for you to have a firm understanding and belief in all this. My old website layout required you to read a lot, as I tried to qualify statements as they were presented. I have instead elected to rewrite this website into this new format as I don’t want to just “say stuff” – I want it to be backed scientifically so that it cannot be easily refuted. I have broken the basic concepts out below and invite you to review the information in each. If you don’t read them in detail then that’s fine, but I encourage you to have at least over-viewed them.

Introductions To The Science

I invite you to read the introduction to Neuroscience as it contains a great interview between Paula Marantz Cohen and Dr. James Giordano discussing how neuroscience fits into our current economic, political, and social environment, the future of neuroethics, developments in neurolaw, and the military’s weaponization of brain science! As well the introduction to Quantum Biology, serving to be an update to the older biological texts which often left the precision of “how” processes were possible unexplained. It also references the concepts of Quantum Tunneling and Quantum Entanglement.

Introduction to the Brain and Nervous Systems – How They Work

This section covers how the nervous system and brain function, both operationally and electrically. As this is what we want to interface with, I cannot stress how important it is for you to have reviewed this knowledgebase article as it provides a foundation for everything discussed later. We truly are electrical beings!

How Does The Brain Process Thought?

Of course, knowing how the brain and nervous system work only takes you so far when you are researching a topic such as this. In order to interface with a biological being you must know how each of the different parts work and how low and high level thought occurs. I therefore offer these next two knowledgebase articles where we can see that scientists have been working to understand how the brain “thinks” and also to decode the brain (reverse engineer the brain). It’s interesting to note that scientists have been able to derive the mathematical equation that emulates how the brain interprets visual signals coming from the eyes.

How The Body Functions, Electrically

I also encourage you to read this next knowledgebase article which outlines in greater detail as to how the body works electrically and how it can be viewed as an electrical circuit. Prior to all this research I never once thought about that interconnected organs can be compared to various electrical components (resistor, capacitor, inductor, etc.). Of course, this also then leads to our understanding as to how our bodies could be viewed (electrically) within our environment. Electricians have a basic understanding of this as they are trained to identify how they can remain “neutral” while working in a high-voltage situation! I also overview the Human Biofield (also known as the Human Electrical Field) in this knowledgebase article.

Can The Brain And Body Be Affected By Externally Applied EMF?

As we are electrical in nature, we are therefore susceptible to any form of EMF that is compatible with our bodies. How susceptible we are depends on quite a few things. Scientists and researchers have been working to both Read and Write information to the Human Biofield. I encourage you to read this next knowledgebase article as it identifies how the body reacts to various types of Electromagnetic stimulation, such as RF signals, light, magnetics, and etc.

How Does The Brain And Nervous Systems Interpret Externally Applied EMF?

Now that we have ascertained that the body can be affected by externally and remotely applied low-level EMF, let’s take a quick look at how the brain and nervous system might interpret it.

For instance, one could influence a person’s emotions by modulating signals and applying them to the Limbic System. Therefore, it becomes possible to induce feelings and emotions in a person while also inducing sounds into the body (bypassing the ears) – and if the sounds were in the form of subliminal messaging, then this could act as a form of intention control. Such as was found with MKULTRA and the Russian “LIDA” machine, one could also induce heat in tissue, or visual elements to introduce ‘controlled’ behaviors into a person.

As well, light can be used to stimulate brain tissue – so long as the brain tissue has been modified to act upon that stimulus – which could induce anything intended so long as the correct brain segments were properly stimulated. This article describes how this can be accomplished by using a virus to cross over the blood/brain barrier to deliver a modification to brain tissue that enables it to be stimulated by light applied externally to the body.

Current Accomplishments / Capabilities

With those basics in place, it might now be a good time to see where this information has taken us. In the “Current and Future Applications” knowledgebase article I showcase some of the more interesting current capabilities and research currently underway. In the “Brain to Brain, Brain to Computer, and Computer to Brain Interfaces” knowledgebase article I showcase some of the accomplishments having been made by researchers working to interface computers and devices with the human brain.

Psychotronics (ParaPhysics) – Interactions of Matter, Energy, and Consciousness

Mention this in Western Society and you might be met with ridicule, laughter, or mentioning of the movie “Men Who Stare At Goats”. But on the other side of the world people are far more open to these ideas. On both sides of the world there has been active research – I’d find it pretty amazing if the Soviets spent over $1 Billion on research that yielded no value [Sources: News.com.au, Cornell University Library]. While we seem to talk less about it nowadays, earlier generations described ‘sensing’ danger, or having a ‘creepy feeling’ from time to time (usually when someone was watching them or when something happened to a loved one). This sparked interest in researchers.

Psychotronics – Interactions of Matter, Energy, and Consciousness

Directed Energy Weapons

Of course, people of power want to keep their power. It is therefore logical to conclude that military forces around the world are working to weaponize this knowledge. Of course, I hope you also find it logical to conclude that not just those controlling militaries would want to weaponize this – ANY person or groups of people having the resources required would be working to weaponize this knowledge – like perhaps transnational organized crime groups that generate Trillions of dollars annually. Could you imagine what they might do with technologies such as these?

Ethics – Human Experimentation

Living in a civilized society we all hope that any research performed considers some sort of ethical boundaries – and certainly most of it is. But for some people in power it is more important to know the results of the experiment than to be ethical about the experiment. Therefore you should not be surprised to hear that some of the research performed lacked even basic levels of human ethics – and that it was performed by governments around the world. Considering this, one should really worry about any experiments performed by transnational organized crime groups as they would not have to consider any level of human ethics at all. While I was researching technologies, I stumbled across individuals who call themselves “Targeted Individuals”. Amazingly, their complaints align extremely well with symptoms reported by those US Diplomats and spies that have come forward recently, bringing attention to a new type of biological weapon that is available and seems to be currently in use.

Weaponizing The Science

Why talk about Ethics above? Well, because it is a good introduction to this last topic that you need to be aware of prior to reviewing some ideas that I have as to how we can remotely interface with weak biological signals – because I’m certainly not the only one talking about this! In this knowledgebase article I raise attention to information that has been provided by some extremely well known and accredited industry professionals, advocates, and whistleblowers.

Isolating Weak Signals From Noise

Often when I speak about extracting biological signals by remote means I am told it is impossible due to the amount of surrounding ‘noise’. So now I am quick to point out that we are able to detect ultra-weak signals both on and off our planet, amplify ultra-weak signals without the introduction of a massive amount of noise, and design filters that filter out significant noise from messy signals having weak signals in them.

Reading Ultra-Weak Signals

Of course, this is this last stumbling block that impedes discussion on remotely reading weak biological signals – while I agree it is difficult – I disagree that it is impossible. I invite you to read about some of the popular technologies used to read biological siganls – and some of the under-published articles about technologies that can read ultra-weak signals (even off planet!).

Who Else Is Working To Tame These Impossibles?

Let’s not kid around – this is a hot topic that is kept quiet. While there are lots of educational institutions, and private companies and research agencies working on various technologies, for those who are new to all this, I’ll reference some of the research being performed by one of the largest and most well funded research institutions employed by the US Government and Military called, “Darpa“. Here are just a few of Darpa’s initiatives (current and past) – these will give you an idea as to the type of research being performed:

Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology (N3) program is pursuing the following technologies:

  • A device that uses an acousto-optical approach to record from the brain and interfering electrical fields to write to specific neurons using ultrasound waves to guide light into and out of the brain to detect neural activity.
  • An acousto-magnetic device for writing to the brain that pairs ultrasound waves with magnetic fields to generate localized electric currents for neuromodulation.
  • A magneto-genetic approach to make neurons sensitive to magnetic fields.
  • An integrated device that uses focused ultrasound for writing to neurons.

According to US DARPA these:

“interfaces could ultimately enable diverse national security applications such as control of active cyber defense systems and swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles, or teaming with computer systems to multitask during complex missions.”

“Electrical Prescriptions”, which seeks to deliver non-pharmacological treatments for pain, general inflammation, post-traumatic stress, severe anxiety, and trauma that employ precise, closed-loop, non-invasive modulation of the patient’s peripheral nervous system. Called, “ElectRx”, the technology would exploit and supplement the body’s natural ability to quickly and effectively heal itself, intervening when required to correct or bolster nervous system activity, by establishing the underlying science and developing the technologies that could enable artificial modulation of peripheral nerves to restore healthy patterns of signaling in these neural circuits.

Back in 2017 DARPA initiated research into the ability to upload and download knowledge directly into and from the brain, and is working to create an ability for people to telepathically communicate. They are researching how we can read and write to soldiers’ minds [second article here]. How to read their minds and control their bodies [Sources: Defense One, Wired, Wired, Nextgov, Express, Time, Defense One, Wired]. Darpa has also initiated seven projects aimed to: stimulate the vagus nerve using electrical impulses (affecting different parts of the body), use pulses of light to alter neural circuits involved in neuropathic pain, explain how ultrasound can be used to stimulate neurons, and use magnetic fields to activate neurons [Source: Darpa]. DARPA is pushing magnetic field sensing to a new era with the “Atomic Magnetometer for Biological Imaging In Earth’s Native Terrain (AMBIIENT) program”. The AMBIIENT program promises the ability to read the magnetic field generated by the body without needing the subject to be shielded from the Earth’s magnetic field.

In mainstream science, researchers are working to reduce the time it takes for an individual to learn new tasks and operations (another article), and have also discovered a way to introduce memories into the brain of a mouse in the absence of experience! In 2014 scientists enabled a paralyzed woman to control a robotic arm wirelessly with her mind! In 2012, scientists were able to give prosthetics a sense of ‘touch’! Going further back in time, in 2009 BCI technologies matured to a degree where both the machine and the brain are able to modify the other’s behaviors.

Even the home enthusiast is able to manufacture solutions using off-the-shelf products, such as this inventor who used a grouping of sensors hooked up to an Arduino MEGA, that was able to read human magnetic fields in an un-shielded environment (real-world biological signal reading – not in a lab)!

And of course, lets not forget about the patents! There are thousands of them – here are just a few.

Taming The Impossibles

After reading all this you may be wondering why I am promoting this research. My reason is actually very simple and has already been presented: I think we can all benefit from this technology. You have to think of it this way – someone will do this research – so wouldn’t it be best for any knowledge gained to be in the public domain because then nobody would have an edge over another, and it could not be used to further any particular interests by those able to find it first.

So let’s keep moving forward! Through my research on these topics I’ve found most discussions on the ‘possibilities’ centering around three misconceptions:

1 I often hear, “It takes significant amounts of energy to affect the body” and the second that “The majority of the strength of any biologically generated signals is lost into the surrounding cellular structures (reducing the amount of signals escaping the body)”. If you read the applicable knowledgebase article above, you’ll notice that the body is actually quite receptive to low-level externally applied electromagnetic signals so long as you consider the surrounding cellular materials and use a well formed signal (a signal shaped as if it had been generated by the body). In fact one researcher concluded that biological beings can be affected by electrical signals 1/50th of the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field – which is considerably less power than prior believed to be required. Considering that while each of us generate unique biological signals, we all still share the same physiology, makeup, and construction using the same materials. Therefore, while we each generate a unique core biological signal, all of the other signals generated by the body are essentially the same across all of us. Therefore, if we knew the most constant signals generated by the body, and we knew how those signals were shaped, and could read those signals from background noise, then we would be able to read biologically generated signals easily, per person. When you are inducing a signal into the brain to get an intended result, it has been noticed that if you match the signals of the brain more precisely (directly imitating the ‘patterns’ used by the brain) then far less energy is required to induce that information onto the brain than prior thought. In fact, you can do this using signals having less power than can be produced biologically (naturally)! This has been proven, with a study that noticed melatonin levels could be adjusted by applying a structured magnetic field having intensity within the nano-Tesla range, set to varying pulse duration. And in another study where it was noticed patients suffering from neurological disorders experienced significant changes when exposed to short durations of magnetic fields within the pico to nano-Tesla range, again using structured magnetic fields being applied within a very localized brain space.  While the structure of the fields required need to be investigated, the power levels are always found to be similar to those generated globally by communication systems – which we are all subjected to daily.

2 The second is that people do not really generate electrical signals – in fact most people dismiss that we are essentially electrical beings. Again, in reading the knowledgebase articles above, you’ll notice that we are, in fact, electrical beings, and that we do generate various types of energy. It is unfortunate that Western Society has associated this concept with that of ‘quackery’ – hopefully now you now have a wider view. We must remember that the body generates biological signals in repeatable patterns that are general in design (pattern). This means that while we are all unique, we all still share the same common thought patterns, and the electrical signals generated by the brain look the same because our brains are all formed in essentially the same shape and work in the same way! So, when I think of a hammer in my mind, the electrical patterns that are created by the brain are essentially the same as the ones in your brain when you think of a hammer! Therefore thoughts can be quickly read and decoded by reading the correct electrical signals generated by the brain.

3 The last I agree with – surrounding electrical/magnetic “noise” (other present and undesired EMF energy or signals) can make it extremely difficult to remotely read weak biological signals – but it does not make this impossible. I encourage you to read the following two knowledgebase articles: in the first I review current technologies used to read weak biological signals, and in the second I review technologies that can be used to extract signals from noise. Of course, once we have reached a point where brain signals can be remotely read from a great distance, there will be a need to separate the ‘good’ signals from background noise – perhaps this chip will help with that! The chip’s function is to clean up and interpret the electrical signals that are generated by the brain – oh – and it’s already in production!

Taming The Impossibilities – Things To Consider

Bandwidth – Thinking Of The Brain – Wouldn’t There Be A Lot Of Data To Acquire And Process?

Certainly we would need to consider which parts of the body to interface with, and may need to use multiple technologies simultaneously. As an example, there is a lot of technology used today that will allow us to read emotional states remotely. For instance, a technology called, “VibraImage“, can detect many emotional states using standard digital, web, or television cameras. It leverages that human head micro-vibration is linked with the vestibular-emotional reflex (VER) of a person and reflects emotions levels. Yet another technology uses voice analysis to detect Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. MIT scientists have discovered a way of reading emotional states using wireless signals – by analyzing your heartbeat! (MIT publication here.) Of course, there are also the ‘old school’ methods of using EEG or Infrared.

You also would not need to read all of the person’s biological signals – especially in the brain. For example, we could tune into a persons “Inner Voice”, rather than reading all of the lower level signals used to generate it. When deep in thought a few people think in “pictures” (visually), while most think using their “inner voice”. If you use your inner voice, then that is the voice that your brain generates as you think things through, or when you read silently. Most people are unaware of this, but if you concentrate, you may be able to notice whether you think using your voice or with images. Here is a funny video, with a doctor (who uses his inner-voice during thought) interviewing someone that does not have an inner-voice – he tries to compare how each think things through. Here is a link to his blog on this topic. Here is a BBC article showcasing our ability to extract the ‘silent speech’ that we hear in our heads. A link to another article describing how a person’s inner voice can be extracted and decoded. And here is an article advising as to how scientists were able to reconstruct an individuals speech from the human auditory cortex. If you are familiar with computer audio files, then you know how small they are when limited to just the range of the human voice. Even if you acquired both visual and audio information from a brain the data set collected would be extremely small. It would not be much larger if you extracted one single voice and the person’s top level brain ‘patterns’! And consider that the person would use this voice to disclose all of their most intimate thoughts – bank pins, passwords, responses, etc… And that person would not have any way of stopping you from doing this.

As described in knowledgebase articles we know that words and images trigger specific neural reactions. For instance, the word “cat” when heard, will trigger the parts of the brain responsible for the concept of a “cat”. We also understand that all brains generate the same ‘pattern’ when we think of a “cat”, or other object / concept. So rather than try to transmit all of the brain signals generated by the brain and deciphering them, one could just receive the brains overall ‘patterns’. An example: if an individual is listening to their father talking about feeding a cat in the house, and you wanted to know what was happening but could not hear the conversation, then you could ‘eavesdrop’ and re-construct the conversation by ‘receiving’ the higher level thoughts / concepts: (house), (father), (cat), (hunger), (food). Watch this video presentation from the History Channel for an overview. Watch the whole thing or zoom into 7:42.

Wait! How Could You Capture All This Data? Isn’t The Brain Faster Than A Computer?

Not any more! Here is a news article advising of a new method developed by researchers at Lund University in Sweden, making it possible to re-code neural signals into a format that computer processors can use instantly. The Lund researchers used simulated recordings from nerve cells to evaluate the method, and were able to show that they can simultaneously collect data from over one million nerve cells, analyze the information, and provide feedback within just a few milliseconds (two way communications with individual nerve cells). An example: if an individual is listening to their father talking about feeding a cat in the house, then you could read the triggered ‘patterns’ (signals) from the appropriate higher-functioning brain nodes (the area of the brain that recognizes the combined concepts of the cat, house, and food). You’d now be extracting a relatively small signal (pattern) – compared to if you tried to capture all of the supporting signals generated by the brain.

With communication and computer systems operating as fast as they now do (at the speed of light for fiber-optics, Wi-Fi and satellite signals operate well beyond the Giga-hertz range) so long as the information is extracted in a computer friendly way, then because the information does not need to be altered or re-computed / re-constructed, it is quite possible to store a tremendous amount of data to SSD drives and build algorithms on fast processors to enable quick and efficient searches. In case you are thinking it would be impossible to track and store all of this data in real-time, then I offer just a few examples where governments have in-fact collected tremendous amounts of personal data of citizens from around the world using computer systems, in real-time, and that deliver almost instant responses to any presented complex query:

  • Project “PRISM” – Britain’s spy agency gained access to the cables which carry the world’s phone calls and Internet traffic and shared vast streams of sensitive personal information with the United States National Security Agency (NSA). They are recording more than 21 petabytes a day [Source: The Guardian].
  • Total Information Awareness – a program which was promoted as a tool to gather detailed information about individuals in order to anticipate and prevent crimes before they are committed.
  • The LifeLog program – was to enable the tracing of the ‘threads’ of an individuals life (events, states, and their relationships). It has the ability to “take in all of a subject’s experience, from phone numbers dialed and e-mail messages viewed to every breath taken, step made and place gone”. Article found here.
  • And more – check these out! [Sources: Spiegel, MarketWatch, The Guardian, BBC, The Star, Wikipaedia, Global News, CBC News, CBC News].
  • Check out my knowledgebase article for more!

Bandwidth – Thinking About Multiple People

In this article it is clear that the same method used to quickly process brain signals can also be applied to higher levels of data processing – meaning that not only can you read and write a group of a million neurons almost instantly, but by applying the same technique you can do the same across many groups of a million neurons! This means that you could process the information generated by a LOT of people extremely quickly and all at the same time!

“Imagine that you want to hear what ten people in the room next door are talking about. If you listen by putting your ear against the wall you will just hear murmurs, but if you put a microphone on each person in the room, it transforms your ability to understand the conversation. And then think about being able to listen to one million individuals, find patterns in what’s communicated and instantly respond to it — that’s what our new method makes possible.”

Martin Garwicz, Professor of Neurophysiology at Lund University

But How Could You Isolate Just One Person?

In case you’ve skipped over the knowledgebase articles, I’ve already outlined that even though we share so much in common everyone is still unique in many different biological ways – and thus some of our biologically generated signals are also unique. Therefore, it would be possible to isolate a single person out from millions of signals.

Without much research two possible solutions could be to use Filters to isolate a unique biological signal, or mathematics (sort of like is used to track objects using fractal antennae). We need to focus research on the discovery of all of the signals that the body generates during thought, and how these ‘common patterns’ can be read using electronics. Through this we would need a way to identify each person uniquely, whether it be by frequencies, signal intensity, or established brain patterns. I am working to learn the frequencies of the organs in the body, the nervous system, the different parts of the brain, and the whole brain and body. I believe it possible to extract these signals by tuning into their specific frequencies / patterns and using filters to remove “noise”. While every person on the Earth is unique in some way, essentially we all generate frequencies within the same range, thus it would be important to find a way of separating out the signals from each other. Perhaps a technology such as this could help: here is an article regarding the optical unmasking of spectrally overlapping RF signals.

Tracking a person’s biological signal would be different depending as to the medium that the technology would be based in. In other words, we need to be able to either track people through physical or electromagnetic means.

Environmental Considerations

To build / design / theorize a solution, we need to understand the environment that the solution will reside in. Take for instance that as humans, while underground, in water, on land, or in space, and while sitting in a steel box, driving a car, flying in a plane, swimming in the water, or just sitting in the sun, we are constantly exposed to three common things – the Earth’s magnetic field, electromagnetic signals, and Neutrinos. So it could make sense that the solution would need to be compatible with these!

As mentioned in the knowledgebases, every single physical ‘system’ on the Earth (water flowing, air currents, the touching of the ground, etc.) can be converted into an electrical diagram – with all of us existing somewhere on or in it and thus interacting with it in some way. Therefore it would seem that there would be three possibles: magnetism, energy, or Quantum Mechanics (Entanglement)?

Reciprocity Theory

Reciprocity Theory states that if you can read signals in a medium, then they can be introduced into that same medium. The human body essentially works like an antenna (dipole or fractal). Therefore it makes sense that if your entire body can be used like an antenna, then so could your spinal cord, as it acts as a conduit to transmit signals throughout your body. As your nervous system works on the same principles, it would work the same way.

Weak Signals

Discussed prior, while some strong biologically generated signals can already be read at a pretty good distance away from the body – like the heart – most people believe that weaker signals (like EEG) cannot be easily read due to environmental noise, signal intensity, and absorption into the body. Now that we know this, it suddenly seems quite logical that as we can use devices to read electromagnetic signals both on the Earth and in space, and as our bodies generate and interact with electromagnetic signals, it must be completely possible for us to be able to read weak signals generated by the body and interface with them – we just haven’t been approaching it correctly. In order to read biological signals remotely we need to find a suitable electrical or magnetic based reference in which to couple with, that would help to amplify the biological signals generated by the body above the noise – OR – do something else like use ultra-precise filters during the extraction of the signals and use machine algorithms to reconstruct the brain signals from known patterns.

Signals Too Weak? Change The Measurement Reference Point

When we speak of signal analysis, we often find ourselves thinking “in the box” and referencing Earth Zero (ground). This approach is quite limited, as the signal strengths are already weak as when referenced to “Ground”. Would it not be best to change the point of reference to something that would make the measurement of these weak signals easier? This would cause the signals to be higher in amplitude, and having less noise – thus easier to read.

As an example, we reference “Ground” as 0 Volts (the ground). If you measured some circuit referencing “ground” you’d get some values per each measurement. In my research I learned that as you penetrate deeper into the ground or go higher in the sky, the energy potential changes away from “Ground”. Therefore, if dug a deep hole and referenced that energy potential as “Ground”, and then measured the same circuit – you’d get different results. Perhaps this is what Tesla was doing, back in the early 1900’s?

Signal Strengthening / Conditioning

Depending on the solution design, a signal strengthening solution may be required. This would allow a weak signal to be amplified above the noise floor, so that it could be ‘read’. There are strong sources and weak sources of biologically generated signals, and it is possible to detect stronger biologically generated signals via the nervous system. Usually, the general public is very quick to dismiss this as a concept on the basis that the signal levels detected often fall into the levels associated with ‘noise’ – making it difficult to extract them. Therefore, we would need to determine how to raise low level signals in the brain above the noise floor, or we would need to be able to isolate these signals from within the noise floor. Perhaps AI could help with this, if it were provided with a large sampling of signals? For instance, here is an example of a sensor that can detect extremely faint radio waves and convert them into signals that can be transmitted via fiber optics. Here is another example of a signal strengthener – this one is called an Electron Multiplier. While most production solutions search for signals within a limited range of frequencies, this solution can detect ‘patterns’ within the signals that it receives and can scan through a wide band of signals – it is a new quantum spectrum analyzer that has the potential of surpassing the fundamental limitations of traditional electronics in sensitivity, bandwidth and frequency range, as it is able to ‘read’ signals between 0 and 20 Gigahertz (another article here). This system is essentially an atomic RF receiver and spectrum analyzer that uses Rydberg atoms coupled to a planar microwave wave-guide. The system uses an off-resonant RF heterodyne technique to achieve continuous operation for carrier frequencies ranging from 0 (dc) to 20 GHz. The system has an 4 MHz instantaneous bandwidth, and over 80 dB of linear dynamic range. Preparing the signal using a low-noise preamplifier, it was able to demonstrate high-performance spectrum analysis with peak sensitivity greater than −145dBm/Hz. In testing, with a standard rabbit-ears antenna attached, the spectrum analyzer detected weak ambient signals including FM radio, AM radio, WiFi, and Bluetooth. Gee, I wonder what the Military has?

Target Acquisition

While perhaps a strange way of thinking about this, if you apply my desire to remotely extract biological signals to technologies, one might think of a person as being a ‘Target’. If you do this then concepts like using Quantum Radar to detect people seem less ‘odd’ to consider when you are seeking ways of extracting biological signals. Or solutions like this where a team developed a system that could track people behind a wall using a signal that is 0.1% as strong as a Wi-Fi signal. Any system that could allow you to locate a target would still need to be coupled with other systems that would enable you to ‘couple’ with a person’s energy, or ‘read’ their energy.

There are some really interesting technologies that are available that can detect ‘targets’, such as over-the-horizon-radar, but this would be only part of the whole picture. A problem with over-the-horizon-radar is that while this technology works well, the published information about this technology is such that it lacks the resolution to allow a coupled system to extract biological signals from that distance. Nonetheless, it is amazing that it can detect small objects moving as slow as 2.8 km/h from 120 km away!

How To Broadcast A Signal Onto Just One Person – Signal Tuning

Depending on the solution chosen, a logical question is – how do you broadcast a signal onto just one person? Signal tuning is the ability to ‘tune’ a signal onto a target (to focus the signal on a target). There are a multitude of approaches, and I will touch on just a couple of them:

  • In one, a signal is broadcast and when this happens a reflective signal is returned. By analyzing the returned signal, you are able to ‘see’ where the target is by how the target interacts with your signal. Using mathematics, you can then change the waveform being broadcast to make the signal ‘stronger’, broadcasting the new signal and again checking the returned signal. This pattern continues in such a way as that the signal being broadcasted is able to be received by the target with maximum signal strength – even though standard signal broadcast methods would normally completely fail to be received.
  • Some other approaches use a technique called “Time Reversal Signal Processing“, which has three main uses: creating an optimal carrier signal for communication, reconstructing a source event, and focusing high-energy waves to a point in space. The time reversal technique is based upon reciprocity: given a solution to a wave equation, the time reversal (using a negative time) of that solution is also a solution. While this technique can only be applied in a few mediums, it can be applied to: sound waves in water or air, ultrasonic waves in human bodies, and electromagnetic waves in free space – so long as the medium is approximately linear. Perhaps using Time Reversal Signal Processing, would eliminate the need to track the subject as the signal is automatically adjusted without the transmitter needing to know the location of the intended receiver. If you did use this system, however, you would need to consider that there is a loss of energy when signals are transmitted – therefore this could have limited implications on the ability to affect or read the target. I believe that for this to work you would need to have a considerable antenna array covering a large area – satellites are capable of generating the power required to penetrate the body… As well I would think that some form of ‘line of sight’ would be required for this to work, and I’m not sure that signals would penetrate grounded materials – thus it would be limited in its reach. However, reach could be extended if you were to use a new antenna system that uses multiple, separate antennae having the ability to receive signals broadcast at an angle of almost 90 degrees from the receiving surface.
  • Perhaps a Spot Beam could be used? Spot Beams are currently used by direct broadcast satellite companies, who need to transmit different data signals using the same frequency, to targeted geographical locations.
  • This could also be accomplished using phased array antenna technology (beam steering). While mechanical radars are required to be physically aimed at an object for tracking and observation, phased array antenna remain in a fixed position. Objects are tracked with precision through adjustments made to the incoming and outgoing signals which are changed within millionths of a second.

Next Steps…

On the second page in this topic I start to solution possible approaches.